Moreno Frau – Universitร  degli studi di Cagliari, Via Santโ€™Ignazio da Laconi, 74, 09123, Cagliari, Italy
Francesca Cabiddu – Universitร  degli studi di Cagliari, Via Santโ€™Ignazio da Laconi, 74, 09123, Cagliari, Italy

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ITEMA.S.P.2019.117

 

3rd International Scientific Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology, Tourism, Economics, Management and Agriculture – ITEMA 2019 – Bratislava, Slovakia, October 24, 2019, SELECTED PAPERS published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade; Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade, ISBN 978-86-80194-24-0, ISSN 2683-5991, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ITEMA.S.P.2019

 

 

Abstract

This paper explores digital data exploitation behaviors and shows how these comportments
change according to the data sources employed by the firms when trying to develop
their products. This article aims to provide a theoretical framework concerning how digital
data are employed for product development. Since the relationship between data exploitation
and product development represents an empirically under-explored research area, the authors
adopt an exploratory multiple case study design to develop new theoretical and empirical insights
pertaining to this topic. This paper provides guidelines that help agri-food firms recognize
the features of how food processing might take advantage of digital transformation and
digital data gaining competitiveness by improving production efficiency and supporting the
development of their products.

 

Keywords

Digitization, Digital Transformation, Food Processing, Product Development, Behavior.


โ€‹
References

Barrenar, Ramo, Teresa Garcรญa, & Dena Marรญa Camarena. (2015). โ€˜An Analysis of the Decision
Structure for Food Innovation on the Basis of Consumer Ageโ€™. International Food and
Agribusiness Management Review 18(3): 149โ€“170.
Beckeman, Mรคrit, Michael Bourlakis, & Annika Olsson. (2013). โ€˜The Role of Manufacturers in
Food Innovations in Swedenโ€™. British food journal 115(7): 953โ€“974.
Beckeman, Mรคrit, & Annika Olsson. (2011). โ€˜The Role of Swedish Retailers in Food Innovationsโ€™.
The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 21(1):
51โ€“70.
Bigliardi, Barbara, & Francesco Galati. (2013). โ€˜Innovation Trends in the Food Industry: The
Case of Functional Foodsโ€™. Trends in Food Science & Technology 31(2): 118โ€“129.
Busse, Maria, & Rosemarie Siebert. (2018). โ€˜The Role of Consumers in Food Innovation Processesโ€™.
European Journal of Innovation Management 21(1): 20โ€“43.
Cavaliere, Alessia, & Vera Ventura. (2018). โ€˜Mismatch between Food Sustainability and Consumer
Acceptance toward Innovation Technologies among Millennial Students: The Case
of Shelf Life Extensionโ€™. Journal of Cleaner Production 175: 641โ€“650.
Charlebois, Sylvain, & Mark Juhasz. (2018). โ€˜Food Futures and 3D Printing: Strategic Market
Foresight and the Case of Structur3Dโ€™. International Journal on Food System Dynamics
9(2): 138โ€“148.
Dremel, Christian. (2017). โ€˜How AUDI AG Established Big Data Analytics in Its Digital Transformation.โ€™
MIS Quarterly Executive 16(2).
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., & Melissa E. Graebner. (2007). โ€˜Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities
and Challengesโ€™. Academy of management journal 50(1): 25โ€“32.
Gorgitano, Maria Teresa, Fabio Verneau, & Valeria Sodano. (2017). โ€˜Sustainable Food Innovation
Finding the Right Balance between Technological Determinism and Technophobia.โ€™
Quality-Access to Success 18.
Grunert, Klaus G. (2008). โ€˜User-Oriented Innovation in the Food Sector: Relevant Streams of
Research and an Agenda for Future Workโ€™. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(11):
590โ€“602.
Leek, Sheena, Isabelle Szmigin, & Marylyn Carrigan. (2001). โ€˜Older Consumers and Food Innovationโ€™.
Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 12(1): 71โ€“89.
Loebnitz, Natascha, & Klaus G. Grunert. (2015). โ€˜Evaluative Conditioning of Food Technologiesโ€™.
Psychology & Marketing 32(7): 725โ€“741.
Marette, Stรฉphan. (2009). โ€˜Impact of Environmental, Societal and Health Information on Consumersโ€™
Choices for Nanofoodโ€™. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization
7(2).
Matzler, Kurt, Stephan Friedrich von den Eichen, Markus Anschober, & Thomas Kohler. (2018).
โ€˜The Crusade of Digital Disruptionโ€™. Journal of Business Strategy 39(6): 13โ€“20.

Miles, Matthew B., & A. Michael Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded
Sourcebook. Sage.
Roos, Yrjรถ H. (2016). โ€˜Food Engineering at Multiple Scales: Case Studies, Challenges and the
Futureโ€”a European Perspectiveโ€™. Food Engineering Reviews 8(2): 91โ€“115.
Saldaรฑa, Johnny. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
Schallmo, Daniel, Christopher A. Williams, & Luke Boardman. (2017). โ€˜Digital Transformation
of Business Modelsโ€”Best Practice, Enablers, and Roadmapโ€™. International Journal of
Innovation Management 21(08): 1740014.
Schweitzer, Fiona Maria, Matthias Handrich, & Sven Heidenreich. (2019). โ€˜Digital Transformation
in the New Product Development Process: The Role of It-Enabled PLM Systems
for Relational, Structural, and NPD Performanceโ€™. International Journal of Innovation
Management: 1950067.
Steenis, Nigel D., & Arnout RH Fischer. (2016). โ€˜Consumer Attitudes towards Nanotechnology
in Food Products: An Attribute-Based Analysisโ€™. British Food Journal 118(5): 1254โ€“1267.
Tollin, Karin, & Antonia Erz. (2017). โ€˜The Strategic Viewpoints of Innovation and Marketing
Teams on the Development of Novel Functional Foodsโ€™. In Developing New Functional
Food and Nutraceutical Products, Elsevier, 63โ€“83.
Varese, Erica, & Paola Cane. (2017). โ€˜From Space Food Research and Innovation to Immediate
Advantages for Earth Eating Habits: An Aerospaceโ€“Food Producer Company Case
Studyโ€™. British Food Journal 119(11): 2448โ€“2461.
Weick, Cynthia Wagner. (2001). โ€˜Agribusiness Technology in 2010: Directions and Challengesโ€™.
Technology in Society 23(1): 59โ€“72.

 

Download Full Paper

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans โ€“ UdEkoM Balkan
13/2 Dzona Kenedija St, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs

Udekom Balkans isย a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

Stay up-to-date with our latest achievements, events, and insights by subscribing to our newsletterย  ย  ย  ย 

We donโ€™t spam. Read ourย privacy policyย for more information.

ITEMA conference publications are licensed under aย Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.